|
St. Peter's Episcopal Church in Beverly, MA
|
MEETING NOTES
Historical Context
- Where do you see the modern face of "Empire" in the world around you?
- Empire can be economic, political/authoritarian, or religious
- Prisons and other institutions of confinement
- Inappropriate exercise of power
- The ability to affect others decisions
- Diminshing of human dignity
- Does "Empire" require a certain size or scope? Is a man oppressing his wife or a mother oppressing her children "Empire"?
- What do oppressed people share in common? What does the Gospel offer them?
- Inability to be heard
- Lack of dignity
- Lack of time, resources and opportunity to explore options (cf Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich)
- Hopelessness, frustration, anger
- Oppressed people may not realize they are oppressed
- "Winners" write history
- Gospel offers hope
Theological Context
- Why is the one commandment of Jesus simply built around love?
- We are all capable of love
- No one else can control our love for another person
- It would take a lifetime to figure out
- Love points towards JUSTICE
- Love emphasizes forgiveness
- Love requires listening sympathetically and empathetically
- Love requires finding common ground
- Emulate living in the image of God.
- What is the theology of our shared worship as Anglicans and why has that always been so important to us?
- Non prescriptive (no recipes)
- Celebrates diversity
- Place for dialogue (and joining together in communion helps to do that)
- Belief in the Nicene Creed and acceptance of scripture are the only requirements
- We are encouraged/required to bring our brain along.
Political Context
- What is the difference between a political body and the Body of Christ?
|
Political Body
|
Body of Christ
|
|
|
Brings together |
| Demands conformity |
Praying --> Discernment |
| Attempts to have God align with its tenets |
Also political |
| Shorter life span |
Aligns itself with God |
| Specific "one issue" agendas |
Focus on theologies |
| |
|
| |
|
- What is your dream of a church that "shows no partiality?"
- An ongoing dream that we must strive for
- It would have no Windsor Report
- Inclusive
- Dignity through equal respect for all
- Think about who is not in, or has left, our Church and why
- A Muslim woman leading prayers in a mixed gender group (which happened to be in an Episcopal Church!)
Cultural Context
- Why was Jesus the "Christ of change?"
- We werent getting Gods intent (LOVE), only his rules
- Jesus way of teaching (dynamic thought process) helped foster change
- The Beatitudes invert the social structure
- Meets you where you are and moves you towards change
- When and where will we see the new revelation (and will we recognize it?)
- Prayer/faith
- Jesus sent to change culture
- What does being "The Middle Way" mean for us as Anglicans?
- How we find truth and how we search for agreement
- We go through the Narthex to the discussion room (Sanctuary) but we bring our prejudices with us and are ready to listen and change
- A worldwide heterogeneous culture
- Provides a safe haven for different ideas and the exchange of thoughts and beliefs
The Windsor Report itself
- (Historical) How could the Windsor Report help the oppressed to find hope within the Anglican Communion, or, how could it be used to further divide oppressed peoples?
|
Find Hope
|
Further Divide
|
|
|
Communion vs Revelation |
| Desire to reconcile within, to do work as Body of Christ in Communion |
Proposes to elevate Archbishop of Canterbury to "mini Pope" |
| Rejection of Archbishop of Canterbury as mini-Pope |
Gay community feels stonewalled by the Anglican Communion. The Windsor Report fails to acknowledge this. |
| Provides a balanced view of the history |
|
- Shows willingness to continue dialogue
|
|
- (Theological) In what ways does the Windsor Report reflect our theology and in what ways does it seem to offer a different theology?
|
Our Theology
|
Different Theology
|
|
|
"all" welcomed but not everywhere |
| Adiaphora |
Autinomy/Subsidiarity |
| Emphasizes that scripture must be taken as a whole |
|
- Attempts to avoid advocating a single theological position
|
|
- (Political) How does the Windsor Report seem to be a part of church politics in the Anglican Communion and how does it transcend those politics?
|
Part of
|
Transcend
|
|
|
Did not say ECUSA was wrong, only that we had not explained ourselves |
| Too much power for Bishops |
Trying for Covenant may be a way to discern where we agree and disagree |
- (Cultural) How does the Windsor Report reflect the historic tradition of the Anglican Communion, or, how does it change that tradition?
|
Reflect Tradition
|
Change Tradition
|
- Tries to find a place where we can be in communion
|
Names Gene Robinson (which is unnecessary) |
| Reiterates the "Do not poach" precept of the Anglican Communion |
|
Additional uncategorized thought
- The African Bishops are caught in the cross fire between authoritative regimes ("Empire") and oppressed peoples
- ECUSA is trying to change the Church by not reflecting the status quo
- The Ionian Eucharist Manny used was wonderful.
|
|
St. Peter's Episcopal Church in Beverly, Massachusetts
|